Ok, I'll fix it. Regards,
Alejandro On 9/6/07, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > please doesn't change kannel http mode. Please define new MO function for > generic HTTP mode instead. > > Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've improved my patch and added extra flexibility. Now it's possible > > to implement full clickatell functionality (including DLR's) by > > properly configure the 'generic' http smsc. > > > > The patch is available here: > > > > http://magicom-bcn.net/kannel/full-mo-http-params-20070905.patch > > > > The patch allows for this new parameters on config: > > > > * This parameters allows to rename the proper MO parameters to > > whatever you like: > > > > mo-from > > mo-to > > mo-text > > mo-udh > > mo-account > > mo-binfo > > mo-dlr-url > > mo-dlr-mid > > mo-flash > > mo-mclass > > mo-mwi > > mo-coding > > mo-validity > > mo-deferred > > mo-dlr-mask > > mo-dlr-stat -> this special one allows you to rename the message_id > > being returned by an external dlr confirmation, such as clickatell's > > "status" parameter. > > > > For example, setting mo-from = whatever, then the "from" parameter > > will be renamed "whatever". > > > > * This allows you to rename the return string the http generic smsc > > returns: > > > > mo-ret-accepted > > mo-ret-denied > > mo-ret-unknown-dlr > > mo-ret-missing-args > > mo-ret-udh-mismatch > > mo-ret-udh-long > > mo-ret-auth-failed > > mo-ret-dlr-accepted > > mo-ret-dlr-denied > > > > For example, the mo-ret-accpeted allows you to change the "Sent." text > > you get for anything else. > > > > Now comes the "new" features: > > > > id-from-reply -> When you send an MT message to an external http smsc > > and you ask for a DLR, kannel "invents" a message_id. This parameters > > allows you to get that message id from the external source, > > effectively enabling the use of DLR's with clickatell. You must fill > > this field with the text expected _before_ the message_id. In the case > > of clickatell that's "ID:". So, if you get "ID:12345678" the > > message_id will be "12345678". > > > > err-from-reply -> Same thing but for error id's. > > > > This 3 parameters allows you to map different external statuses to > > kannel dlr statuses: > > > > dlr-success-regex -> maps to DLR_SUCCESS (0x08) > > dlr-permfail-regex -> maps to DLR_BUFFERED (0x04) > > dlr-tempfail-regex -> maps to DLR_FAILED (0x02) > > > > So, to implement clickatell's connectivity for MT and DLR's, you just > > need to configure like this: > > > > group = smsc > > smsc = http > > system-type = generic > > smsc-id = clicka > > allowed-smsc-id = clicka > > port = 15000 > > send-url = > > "https://api.clickatell.com/http/sendmsg?to=%p&from=%P&text=%b&api_id=NNNNNN&user=XXXXXX&password=PPPPPP&callback=3&deliv_ack=3&req_feat=8192" > > status-success-regex = "ID" status-permfail-regex = "ERR" > > status-tempfail-regex = "TEMP" > > mo-dlr-mid = apiMsgId > > mo-dlr-stat = status > > id-from-reply = "ID:" > > err-from-reply = "ERR:" > > dlr-success-regex ="(004|008)" > > dlr-permfail-regex = "(001|005|006|007|009|010)" > > dlr-tempfail-regex ="(002|003|011)" > > > > I'll explain a little more: > > > > send-url points to the clickatell http api. A few parameters are > > hardcoded, like api_id, user/pass, etc. > > status-*-regex (current kannel functionality) is used to detect > > whether the message was accepted by clickatell's api. > > > > mo-dlr-* is used to map the DLR parameters to kannel's own. > > > > id/err-from-reply is used to fetch the message/error id on MT from > > clickatell's http response. This is mandatory for DLR's only. > > > > dlr-*-regex is used to map the different possible responses to > > different kannel DLR status. So, if kannel responds with "004" or > > "008" a DLR Success will be sent (0x08 for Kannel). > > > > I don't have a two-way account for clickatell, so I couldn't test the > > MO part, but it should be as simple as to map the proper parameters by > > configuring mo-* parameters and maybe mapping some mo-ret-* strings > > also. > > > > Last by not least, the goal of this patch wasn't to replace the > > clickatell interface, but to provide a generic mean to implement other > > SMSC's without writing source code and recompiling. The clickatell > > example was just that, an example of the capabilities being added. > > > > I'd happily try to model other http smsc's (even extending the patch > > to accomodate extra flexibility), just drop me a line in private and > > send me docs about it. > > > > Regards, > > -- > Thanks, > Alex > > > -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
