I think the EMI/UCP SMSC's reject it.
On 01.02.2008, at 14:19, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Andreas Fink schrieb:
EMI/UCP supports missing sender address in operation 01 but I dont
think it does it in operation 51
yep, the specs are a bit unclear for EMI/UCP. How about converting
the msg->sms.sender = NULL in this case into an "" (emptry string)
and pass it as "empty alphanumeric OAdC?
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
