Specs 4.6 says that these fileds (oadc, adc) are only mendatory.
IMO, NULL or empty will result in writing the same way the request.
Vincent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support
Andreas Fink schrieb:
EMI/UCP supports missing sender address in operation 01 but I dont think
it does it in operation 51
yep, the specs are a bit unclear for EMI/UCP. How about converting the
msg->sms.sender = NULL in this case into an "" (emptry string) and pass it
as "empty alphanumeric OAdC?
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
