On 04/03/2008, at 9:54 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
The purpose of this box is to overcome latency problems that arise
when trying to enqueue thousands of messages, for example from PHP.
There's a _real_ bottleneck there, and the proof is, sqlbox does a
much better job than the http interface for bulk enqueueing.
...
For example the PHP extension I'm developing make the function
kannel_send_sms() available as a native function, so no PHP coding
is neccesary. Of course I can achieve the same results by writing my
PHP extension to use the HTTP interface, but I want to get "sqlbox
or better" performance at the same time, without having to have an
sql instance running.
Have you got any numbers? How different is the performance between
HTTP, sql, and your shmem implementation?
--
Giulio Harding
Systems Administrator
m.Net Corporation
Level 2, 8 Leigh Street
Adelaide SA 5000, Australia
Tel: +61 8 8210 2041
Fax: +61 8 8211 9620
Mobile: 0432 876 733
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mnetcorporation.com
