MMlib looks promising... I'll get my hands on it on the weekend, let's see what comes out.
Thanks for the tip! Regards, Alejandro On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Fink schrieb: > > > How many 10'000 messages per second do you need to transport that you > > have bottlenecks like that? > > consider using this "box" for inter-exchnage at operator level. Which > means bottlenecks on the signaling layer disappear and we have a fast > way to inject message where the pipe at the outbound side is much higher > then for normal SMSC accounts. > > > Well thats why there is locking... > > yep, you can't operate on the same variables (shared memory) via 2 > interdependently scheduled logic. > > > Semaphores are to sync inside a process in multiple threads. They dont > > work between multiple processes. You would need a file locking mechanism > > or the like. > > @Alejandro: please have a view here: > > http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/mm/ > > this is obviously you're locking for ;) > > > I would say the whole design is wrong. Shared memory is different in > > most operating systems and frankly I don't think your real problem is > > there. Maybe you share the real issue you are facing? > > Ralf's MM lib layer may be an acceptable approach to have an OS > abstractive approach. > > Stipe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Kölner Landstrasse 419 > 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany > > tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) > http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ > > mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org <st_%7Bat%7D_tolj.org> mailto: > stolj_{at}_kannel.org <stolj_%7Bat%7D_kannel.org> > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >
