don't think discussion is who are the organizations implemented SMS over SS7 rather it more concern weather the feature can be added on kannel or not. And what are the advantages and disadvanges of the above feature in comparision to SMPP.
Regards, Manas On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Paul Bagyenda <[email protected]> wrote: > You want to look at the openss7 project at openss7.org. Or to be more > exact, watch it. As another person has written, SMS over SS7 means > implementing MAP. And TCAP. And SCCP. (Or the SIGTRAN equivalents.) There > are no open source implementations of these. Openss7.org has them in the > works, and are most likely to be the first to do it. > P. > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:38, Donald Jackson wrote: > > No it does not. > > 2009/3/26 sangprabv <[email protected]> > >> Does Mbuni has this ability? >> >> >> >> Willy >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Donald Jackson <[email protected]> >> To: jyoti <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:41:16 +0200 >> Subject: Re: SMS over SS7 >> Yes there is a major advantage to control of the link and obviously cost, >> but then retries, HLR lookups etc will need to be in the SMSC driver which >> is outside the scope of what Kannel is designed to do (IMHO) so this would >> need to be thought about very carefully if done. >> >> If you do write an open source SMSC driver for SS7 I'm sure there will be >> many very happy people :) >> >> Thanks, >> Donald >> >> 2009/3/26 jyoti <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi, >>> If we use sms for push over ss7 E1 link.i.e directly connected to MSC, >>> instead of SMSC(SMPP),Does we will get an advantage? >>> if yes can we devlop kannel to support the above? >>> >>> Waiting for Any suggestion. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards >>> Jyoti Ranjan Panda >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Donald Jackson >> http://www.ddj.co.za/ >> donaldjster(a)gmail.com >> >> > > > -- > Donald Jackson > http://www.ddj.co.za/ > donaldjster(a)gmail.com > > >
