Not all received means not all MO received by bearerbox, this happened only if I use CVS-200909004. If I rollbacked to CVS-20080727 all MO are received and processed. I can't provide any relevant log because nothing weird with the log (I set the verbosity to 0), it just can't received all requested MO. The way I tested it is to create simple PHP script with CURL function and loop it to hit the Kannel HTTP SMSC URL with the n amount hits. Just now I tried to hit 200 MO and CVS-20090904 only received 146 MO, while the other CVS sucessfully received 200. I have no idea what's going on here. Since I didn't make any change with the code.
WIlly On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > You'll have to be a little more specific than "not all received" if > you expect to receive any help from list members. > > Please describe all the steps you took, and post relevant log files > fragments where we may find hints about what's happening. > > Is there any message on the log files when a message is lost? > > How did you queue the 1000 messages? > > The fieldmap patch doesn't modify the kannel http-smsc, only the > generic. You reported that the same problem occurs with the kannel > smsc as well, so I'd start looking on other places. > > And _please_ do not cross-post. > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 16/09/2009, at 10:54, sangprabv wrote: > > > Bearerbox didn't receive all. I tried to send 1000 MO but not all > > received. It doesn't happen with 20080727 cvs version. And also this > > morning I tried 1.4.3, it seems received all 1000 MO. Does fieldmap > > patch cause this problem? > > > > > > > > Willy > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:41 +0200, Franck LAMASUTA wrote: > >> Willy, > >> > >> Are the MO received by bearerbox and not processed or are they not > >> received at all? > >> Did you get anything interesting in the log files? > >> > >> Franck > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sangprabv > >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:29 AM > >>> To: [email protected];Kannel Devel > >>> Subject: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS > >>> > >>> I found that using the latest CVS cause not all MO received and > >>> processed. Is it a bug? Because if I use CVS-20080727 all MO > >>> received > >>> and processed 100%. I simulated generic and Kannel HTTP SMSC > >>> all returns > >>> the same problem. TIA > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Willy > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
