Both configuration is exactly the same.
Willy On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 17:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > Hmm, what about the configuration files? > > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 16/09/2009, at 16:52, sangprabv wrote: > > > Not all received means not all MO received by bearerbox, this happened > > only if I use CVS-200909004. If I rollbacked to CVS-20080727 all MO > > are > > received and processed. I can't provide any relevant log because > > nothing > > weird with the log (I set the verbosity to 0), it just can't received > > all requested MO. The way I tested it is to create simple PHP script > > with CURL function and loop it to hit the Kannel HTTP SMSC URL with > > the > > n amount hits. Just now I tried to hit 200 MO and CVS-20090904 only > > received 146 MO, while the other CVS sucessfully received 200. I > > have no > > idea what's going on here. Since I didn't make any change with the > > code. > > > > > > > > WIlly > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:24 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > >> You'll have to be a little more specific than "not all received" if > >> you expect to receive any help from list members. > >> > >> Please describe all the steps you took, and post relevant log files > >> fragments where we may find hints about what's happening. > >> > >> Is there any message on the log files when a message is lost? > >> > >> How did you queue the 1000 messages? > >> > >> The fieldmap patch doesn't modify the kannel http-smsc, only the > >> generic. You reported that the same problem occurs with the kannel > >> smsc as well, so I'd start looking on other places. > >> > >> And _please_ do not cross-post. > >> > >> Regards, > >> -- > >> Alejandro Guerrieri > >> [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> On 16/09/2009, at 10:54, sangprabv wrote: > >> > >>> Bearerbox didn't receive all. I tried to send 1000 MO but not all > >>> received. It doesn't happen with 20080727 cvs version. And also this > >>> morning I tried 1.4.3, it seems received all 1000 MO. Does fieldmap > >>> patch cause this problem? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Willy > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:41 +0200, Franck LAMASUTA wrote: > >>>> Willy, > >>>> > >>>> Are the MO received by bearerbox and not processed or are they not > >>>> received at all? > >>>> Did you get anything interesting in the log files? > >>>> > >>>> Franck > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: [email protected] > >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sangprabv > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:29 AM > >>>>> To: [email protected];Kannel Devel > >>>>> Subject: HTTP SMSC with the latest CVS > >>>>> > >>>>> I found that using the latest CVS cause not all MO received and > >>>>> processed. Is it a bug? Because if I use CVS-20080727 all MO > >>>>> received > >>>>> and processed 100%. I simulated generic and Kannel HTTP SMSC > >>>>> all returns > >>>>> the same problem. TIA > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Willy > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
