Hi,
Alok's way is superior to kannel's DLR handling. It inserts to the DB much
more information about the original message than can be obtained through the
DLRs alone and passed on to the dlr-url.
If anyone has reduced the resolution of the logs, I am sure it was
unintentional.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" <[email protected]>
To: "Alok Vaidya" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: access log format
Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:
Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Are you programmatically looking for sent/failed SMS by looking
at Kannel logs?
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Alok Vaidya <alok 'at' routesms.com> writes:
Hi,
Thanks for replying. Yes I checked the documentation we can
certainly have a
custom format, but it is about the events that I talking here
like "Sent SMS"/
"FAILED SMS"/"Discarded SMS" etc., I see some changes there.
Mostly I have
figured them out but, I fail to understand some other entries
which I have
mentioned below as also I want to know more such changes.
Let me elaborate why this causes problems. Our parser uses
patterns such as
"Failed SMS" to search for current (14.2 box) entries, now this
event logging
has changed to "FAILED SEND SMS" naturally this will not be
picked up and hence
we loose on such entries. That's my point here.
I might be a little off topic, but why not using the mechanism
made for that kind of things, e.g. receiving delivery reports
from Kannel? It is supported, lets you ask what information you
need, and is of course "supported" accross versions.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
