Hi,
Sorry not to give you that earlier : bearerbox-cvs-20090831
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Then, again, the DATE for the CVS code?
On 18/09/2009, at 14:59, Alok Vaidya wrote:
Hi,
We use the CVS HEAD which I suppose is the 1.5.0 development branch.
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Yeah, I've read that, but considering that latest stable is
1.4.3 and 1.5.0 is still being planned, I don't know what you're
talking about...
Are you talking about CVS HEAD? Then, what's the timestamp
of your checked out version?
On 18/09/2009, at 13:51, Alok Vaidya wrote:
Hi Alenjandro,
I had mentioned about the version in my first mail. It is Kannel -
1.5.0.
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Alok,
Which version are specifically using to do this tests?
CVS? Date?
Maybe you have a routing issue and messages are being
re-injected? Or, if you're using 1.4.3 or an old CVS, intermediate
DLR's would be seen as MO's as well.
Regards,
On 18/09/2009, at 12:48, Alok Vaidya wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for replying. Yes I checked the documentation we can certainly
have a custom format, but it is about the events that I talking here
like "Sent SMS"/"FAILED SMS"/"Discarded SMS" etc., I see some changes
there. Mostly I have figured them out but, I fail to understand some
other entries which I have mentioned below as also I want to know more
such changes.
Let me elaborate why this causes problems. Our parser uses patterns
such as "Failed SMS" to search for current (14.2 box) entries, now this
event logging has changed to "FAILED SEND SMS" naturally this will not
be picked up and hence we loose on such entries. That's my point here.
Entries I cannot figure out:
[1]
2009-09-18 13:27:45 Receive SMS [SMSC:smpp_g12] [SVC:] [ACT:labroc]
[BINF:] [from:sssstest1] [to:+919920315112] [FID:]
[UUID:48425955-1cad-4fe3-8867-bb56fc0bd685] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1]
[msg:132:69643A34383633636164632D633162322D346239662D623335382D623739386336633638356436207375623A30303020646C7672643A303031207375626D697420646174653A30393039313831323033303720646F6E6520646174653A30393039313831323033313220737461743A52454A45435444206572723A30303020746578743A]
[udh:6:050003DC0901]
[2]
2009-09-18 13:27:45 Receive SMS [SMSC:smpp_g12] [SVC:] [ACT:labroc]
[BINF:] [from:sssstest1] [to:+919920315112] [FID:]
[UUID:eed80f6d-3d78-4140-a556-dbb59a856d8f] [flags:-1:0:-1:0:-1]
[msg:132:id:0f22f6f9-8faf-4290-94c1-ce451fa18e21 sub:000 dlvrd:001
submit date:090918120227 done date:090918120242 stat:REJECTD err:000
text:] [udh:6:050003DB0801]
[3]
2009-09-18 13:27:45 Receive SMS [SMSC:smpp_g73] [SVC:] [ACT:labroc]
[BINF:] [from:sssstest1] [to:+919920315112] [FID:]
[UUID:a935aaad-b36c-4e42-8fee-d8e1f03571bf] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1]
[msg:132:69643A66363666323135382D333732352D343337652D616137312D633763333161633234366665207375623A30303020646C7672643A303031207375626D697420646174653A30393039313831323337353720646F6E6520646174653A30393039313831323338323520737461743A52454A45435444206572723A30303020746578743A]
[udh:6:050003DD0901]
The first entry appears to be a normal MT, why then it is named
"Receive SMS" instead of "Sent SMS" ? The second entry though it has
the same event "Receive SMS" appears to be a DLR. Again the 3 rd entry
seems to be a notmal MT message. I tried to make sense of the flags but
to no use.
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Alok,
Check the documentation, you can specify the access
log format to be whatever you like.
Regards,
On 18/09/2009, at 12:23, Alok Vaidya wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to this list instead of the "users" one because people
from this list are more probable of having an answer to my question.
Can anyone please elaborate the new access-log-format, I know we have
moved from 1.4.x to 1.5, I see some compatibility broken here. We have
a process that parses the log files and this format change/break could
cost us dear.
<alok.vcf>
<alok.vcf>
<alok.vcf>
<alok.vcf>
|
