Hi,
AFAIK ton and npi always bundled together. Therefore I don't see
reason to define only one value...
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 09.11.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi,
I don't see a reason to keep these variables bundled. ton is more
frequently changed. npi almost never does. They mean different
things, and are independent of each other. Why not give user the
choice to set whatever they need in configuration? Same holds for
source-addr-ton & npi.
I think it makes more sense to patch the source. In either case if
you decide to go with the guide, I can submit that as well. One of
the two has to be patche, though.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: Alexander Malysh
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c
Hi,
I don't see reason to apply this patch. User can just define ton and
npi settings. Maybe userguide patch
would be more helpful?
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 02.11.2009 um 12:31 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi,
This is another one in my series of trivial patches. This part of
the configuration has caused a lot of confusion in manual
configuring dest-addr-ton over the years, with users prefixing
their numbers with '+' instead of using the configuration.
BR,
Nikos
<smsc_smpp.diff>
