Hi Alex, I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and outgoing DLRs. Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore this is not a issue. But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it to incoming/outgoing the same as for SMS traffic.
Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Any objections? Can I commit? > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote: > >> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: >>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This is much >>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on the same >>> counter. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) msg/sec*, >>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec >>> >>> ... >>> >>> SMSC connections: >>> >>> *fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent 7, >>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>> >>> >>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222 >> >> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side. >> >> Stipe >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kölner Landstrasse 419 >> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany >> >> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) >> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >> >> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >
