Hi,
Outgoing DLRs? Could you elaborate?
AFAIK even now we have HTTP relaying, FAKE and smsc proxying. Reroute-dlr is
differentiating dlrs from sms traffic in the last case. But somehow i don't
think that this is what you have in mind. Are you thinking of turning kannel
to SMSc?
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Malysh" <[email protected]>
To: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Kannel Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: DLR counters on the status page
Hi Alex,
I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and outgoing DLRs.
Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore this is not a
issue.
But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it to
incoming/outgoing
the same as for SMS traffic.
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
Any objections? Can I commit?
Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]
On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This is much
clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on the same
counter.
For example:
...
SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) msg/sec*,
outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec
...
SMSC connections:
*fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent 7,
failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222
yep, I'm in... +0 from my side.
Stipe
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kφlner Landstrasse 419
40589 Dόsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
