Hi
Just don't forget the patch for the kannel-monitor
Thanks / Good work
Alvaro
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> wrote:
> commited to cvs...
>
> Am 11.11.2009 um 17:21 schrieb Alexander Malysh:
>
>> I will commit it shortly...
>>
>> Am 11.11.2009 um 16:54 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>
>>> Yes you're right, now that we have MO and MT dlr info, it makes more sense
>>> to have that on the "dlr" section instead of having it along the SMS data.
>>>
>>> Also on the smsc's, having the <received> and <sent> nodes is more clear.
>>>
>>> I'm +1 on this new format.
>>>
>>> Do you want me to commit it myself or will you do it?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2009, at 16:46, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> I changed your patch a bit. I hope that it would me more clear for users
>>>> what the all counters means.
>>>>
>>>> New patch attached...
>>>> Please let me know what you think?
>>>>
>>>> <dlr_status.diff>
>>>>
>>>> Here examples:
>>>>
>>>> TXT:
>>>> Status: running, uptime 0d 0h 0m 9s
>>>>
>>>> WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued)
>>>>
>>>> SMS: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued), store size -1
>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec
>>>>
>>>> DLR: received 0, sent 0
>>>> DLR: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec
>>>> DLR: 0 queued, using internal storage
>>>>
>>>> No boxes connected
>>>>
>>>> SMSC connections:
>>>> FAKE[FAKE] FAKE:20000 (connecting, rcvd: sms 0 / dlr 0, sent: sms 0 /
>>>> dlr 0, failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
>>>>
>>>> XML:
>>>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>> <gateway>
>>>> <status>running, uptime 0d 0h 0m 35s</status>
>>>> <wdp>
>>>> <received><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></received>
>>>> <sent><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></sent>
>>>> </wdp>
>>>> <sms>
>>>> <received><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></received>
>>>> <sent><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></sent>
>>>> <storesize>-1</storesize>
>>>> <inbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</inbound>
>>>> <outbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</outbound>
>>>> </sms>
>>>> <dlr>
>>>> <received><total>0</total></received>
>>>> <sent><total>0</total></sent>
>>>> <inbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</inbound>
>>>> <outbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</outbound>
>>>> <queued>0</queued>
>>>> <storage>internal</storage>
>>>> </dlr>
>>>> <boxes>
>>>> </boxes>
>>>> <smscs><count>1</count>
>>>> <smsc>
>>>> <name>FAKE:20000</name>
>>>> <admin-id>FAKE</admin-id>
>>>> <id>FAKE</id>
>>>> <status>connecting</status>
>>>> <received><sms>0</sms><dlr>0</dlr></received>
>>>> <sent><sms>0</sms><dlr>0</dlr></sent>
>>>> <failed>0</failed>
>>>> <queued>0</queued>
>>>> </smsc>
>>>> </smscs>
>>>> </gateway>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 14:27 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>>
>>>>> Please see attached. I'm adding the patch for the kannel-monitor later.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <kannel-dlr-status-v2.diff.zip>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 12:33, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 12:09 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, so you'd like the patch to transparently handle the concept of
>>>>>>> "outgoing" dlrs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes that would be great... This is 5 minutes patch :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be useless on many drivers where Kannel's acting as a "client"
>>>>>>> only (SMPP for instance) but yes, on HTTP and derivatives would make
>>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 11:42, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 11:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Outgoing DLR's? At least on SMPP, there's not such a thing: when you
>>>>>>>>> submit an MT with dlr-mask/dlr-url set, the submit_sm PDU has the
>>>>>>>>> delivery receipt flag set. When the message is accepted (the SMSC
>>>>>>>>> sends a submit_sm_resp), kannel creates a first incoming DLR and
>>>>>>>>> later on the SMSC sends one incoming (deliver_sm) DLR (or more, if
>>>>>>>>> intermediate DLR's are enabled) with the message status(es).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you mean with "outgoing DLR's" ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at least for HTTP smsc we can implement DLR forwarding...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 9:36, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and outgoing
>>>>>>>>>> DLRs.
>>>>>>>>>> Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore this
>>>>>>>>>> is not a issue.
>>>>>>>>>> But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it
>>>>>>>>>> to incoming/outgoing
>>>>>>>>>> the same as for SMS traffic.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexander Malysh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections? Can I commit?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> msg/sec*,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMSC connections:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent 7,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stipe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kölner Landstrasse 419
>>>>>>>>>>>> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
