Hi, @Alex: any news about kannel-monitor patch?
Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 11.11.2009 um 19:47 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > Working on it already, it'll be ready for tomorrow probably. > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 11/11/2009, at 19:35, Alvaro Cornejo wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Just don't forget the patch for the kannel-monitor >> >> Thanks / Good work >> >> Alvaro >> | >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier >> celular y Nextel >> en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via >> SMS y GPRS online >> Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y >> www.pravcom.com >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> commited to cvs... >>> >>> Am 11.11.2009 um 17:21 schrieb Alexander Malysh: >>> >>>> I will commit it shortly... >>>> >>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 16:54 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>> >>>>> Yes you're right, now that we have MO and MT dlr info, it makes more >>>>> sense to have that on the "dlr" section instead of having it along the >>>>> SMS data. >>>>> >>>>> Also on the smsc's, having the <received> and <sent> nodes is more clear. >>>>> >>>>> I'm +1 on this new format. >>>>> >>>>> Do you want me to commit it myself or will you do it? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> -- >>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 16:46, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>> >>>>>> I changed your patch a bit. I hope that it would me more clear for users >>>>>> what the all counters means. >>>>>> >>>>>> New patch attached... >>>>>> Please let me know what you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> <dlr_status.diff> >>>>>> >>>>>> Here examples: >>>>>> >>>>>> TXT: >>>>>> Status: running, uptime 0d 0h 0m 9s >>>>>> >>>>>> WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued) >>>>>> >>>>>> SMS: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued), store size -1 >>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec >>>>>> >>>>>> DLR: received 0, sent 0 >>>>>> DLR: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, outbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec >>>>>> DLR: 0 queued, using internal storage >>>>>> >>>>>> No boxes connected >>>>>> >>>>>> SMSC connections: >>>>>> FAKE[FAKE] FAKE:20000 (connecting, rcvd: sms 0 / dlr 0, sent: sms 0 / >>>>>> dlr 0, failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>>> >>>>>> XML: >>>>>> <?xml version="1.0"?> >>>>>> <gateway> >>>>>> <status>running, uptime 0d 0h 0m 35s</status> >>>>>> <wdp> >>>>>> <received><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></received> >>>>>> <sent><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></sent> >>>>>> </wdp> >>>>>> <sms> >>>>>> <received><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></received> >>>>>> <sent><total>0</total><queued>0</queued></sent> >>>>>> <storesize>-1</storesize> >>>>>> <inbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</inbound> >>>>>> <outbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</outbound> >>>>>> </sms> >>>>>> <dlr> >>>>>> <received><total>0</total></received> >>>>>> <sent><total>0</total></sent> >>>>>> <inbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</inbound> >>>>>> <outbound>0.00,0.00,0.00</outbound> >>>>>> <queued>0</queued> >>>>>> <storage>internal</storage> >>>>>> </dlr> >>>>>> <boxes> >>>>>> </boxes> >>>>>> <smscs><count>1</count> >>>>>> <smsc> >>>>>> <name>FAKE:20000</name> >>>>>> <admin-id>FAKE</admin-id> >>>>>> <id>FAKE</id> >>>>>> <status>connecting</status> >>>>>> <received><sms>0</sms><dlr>0</dlr></received> >>>>>> <sent><sms>0</sms><dlr>0</dlr></sent> >>>>>> <failed>0</failed> >>>>>> <queued>0</queued> >>>>>> </smsc> >>>>>> </smscs> >>>>>> </gateway> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 14:27 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please see attached. I'm adding the patch for the kannel-monitor later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <kannel-dlr-status-v2.diff.zip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 12:33, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 12:09 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, so you'd like the patch to transparently handle the concept of >>>>>>>>> "outgoing" dlrs? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yes that would be great... This is 5 minutes patch :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It would be useless on many drivers where Kannel's acting as a >>>>>>>>> "client" only (SMPP for instance) but yes, on HTTP and derivatives >>>>>>>>> would make sense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 11:42, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 11:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Outgoing DLR's? At least on SMPP, there's not such a thing: when >>>>>>>>>>> you submit an MT with dlr-mask/dlr-url set, the submit_sm PDU has >>>>>>>>>>> the delivery receipt flag set. When the message is accepted (the >>>>>>>>>>> SMSC sends a submit_sm_resp), kannel creates a first incoming DLR >>>>>>>>>>> and later on the SMSC sends one incoming (deliver_sm) DLR (or more, >>>>>>>>>>> if intermediate DLR's are enabled) with the message status(es). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What do you mean with "outgoing DLR's" ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> at least for HTTP smsc we can implement DLR forwarding... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2009, at 9:36, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and >>>>>>>>>>>> outgoing DLRs. >>>>>>>>>>>> Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore >>>>>>>>>>>> this is not a issue. >>>>>>>>>>>> But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it >>>>>>>>>>>> to incoming/outgoing >>>>>>>>>>>> the same as for SMS traffic. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander Malysh >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections? Can I commit? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> msg/sec*, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMSC connections: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stipe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kölner Landstrasse 419 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (KSF) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >
