Any chance for a patch that adds another parameter bb_smscconn_send_failed to set the meta_data field for DLR to be merged in the upcoming days? I'm yet to cook it, but it's pretty trivial and should be safe.
2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>: > Hi Rene, > > we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's > better to delay let us know. > > Thanks, > Alexander Malysh > > Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > >> @Alejandro: >> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known bugs". >> >> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has >> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice. >> >> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox. >> >> == Rene >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Alejandro Guerrieri >> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34 >> To: Alexander Malysh >> Cc: Kannel Devel >> Subject: Re: Release plan >> >> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch >> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho. >> >> To describe the problem further: >> >> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only >> observed on MO traffic. >> >> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you >> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The >> logs shows nothing relevant. >> >> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's >> happening. >> >> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's >> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre >> meta-data). >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote: >> >>> Hi together, >>> >>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version. >>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls >> branch. >>> >>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex: >> could you please >>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release >> with Kannel and whether >>> boxes ready for release? >>> >>> The plan would be: >>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge >>> 2) next week testing >>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe >>> >>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether >> somebody sees showstopper. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alexander Malysh >> >> >> >> > > > -- Best regards, Victor Luchitz
