it depends on patch, post it to ML and CC me directly.

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 09.09.2010 um 23:55 schrieb Victor Luchitz:

> Any chance for a patch that adds another parameter
> bb_smscconn_send_failed to set the meta_data field for DLR to be
> merged in the upcoming days? I'm yet to cook it, but it's pretty
> trivial and should be safe.
> 
> 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>:
>> Hi Rene,
>> 
>> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's 
>> better to delay let us know.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander Malysh
>> 
>> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
>> 
>>> @Alejandro:
>>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known bugs".
>>> 
>>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
>>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
>>> 
>>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox.
>>> 
>>> == Rene
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri
>>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
>>> To: Alexander Malysh
>>> Cc: Kannel Devel
>>> Subject: Re: Release plan
>>> 
>>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
>>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
>>> 
>>> To describe the problem further:
>>> 
>>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
>>> observed on MO traffic.
>>> 
>>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
>>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
>>> logs shows nothing relevant.
>>> 
>>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
>>> happening.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
>>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
>>> meta-data).
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi together,
>>>> 
>>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
>>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
>>> branch.
>>>> 
>>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex:
>>> could you please
>>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
>>> with Kannel and whether
>>>> boxes ready for release?
>>>> 
>>>> The plan would be:
>>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
>>>> 2) next week testing
>>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
>>>> 
>>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
>>> somebody sees showstopper.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander Malysh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  Victor Luchitz
> 


Reply via email to