Because the return messsges should be routed to the original client that sent the first message to begin with...
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2011 21:28 Aan: Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> CC: 'Aarno Syvänen' <[email protected]>; [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: Using smppbox id why box-id per client? I meant box-id per smppbox. Why do you want box-id per client? Alex Am 19.10.2011 um 21:17 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > So you want a config option for boxc-id per client? > This is the same as configuring a system-type, isn't it? > > I agree, it's a hack. But better than cluttering the config files. > > == Rene > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Alexander Malysh > Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 19:41 > To: Aarno Syvänen > Cc: [email protected] Devel > Subject: Re: Using smppbox id > > Hi, > > just looked through the source code and I can only agree with Andreas: > system-type has nothing todo with box-id. > I don't know who uses it and why but it's totally wrong. I would just remake > this part and make it straight forward > from design and understanding perspective: kill existing box-id hack and > implement clean config options for box-id > and use _only_ these. > > @Aarno: you changed the code for data_sm only, how about submit_sm? > > Alex > > Am 19.10.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Aarno Syvänen: > >> This relies on assumption that no two smppbox share a client. I cannot > accept this. >> Besides, I can have two smppboxes connected to my application >> >> Aarno >> >> On 19.10.2011, at 15:19, Rene Kluwen wrote: >> >>> Like I said before: In clients.txt, you can put system-type to the >>> opensmppbox-id and you are all set. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf >>> Of Aarno Syvänen >>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 09:35 >>> To: [email protected] Devel >>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>> >>> >>> In my case, there is an application between bearerbox and smppbox. >>> Thus application must route to smppbox and not to its clients. >>> >>> Aarno >>> >>> >>> On 18.10.201 [Het originele bericht is niet volledig opgenomen]
