Hi, seems reasonable for me. Why we need the patch from Aarno then?
Alex Am 21.10.2011 um 22:41 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > Yes, opensmppbox opens a separate box connection per connected client. > > I've heard before that using system-id is indeed more useful. So if you > want, go for that by using use-systemid-as-smsboxid or simply set the > system-type equal to system-id in clients.txt. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alexander Malysh > Sent: Thursday, 20 October, 2011 10:05 > To: Rene Kluwen > Cc: 'Aarno Syvänen'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Using smppbox id > > But the box-id is for the whole box connection or does smppbox open extra > box connection to bearerbox for > each ESME? > > Alex > > > Am 19.10.2011 um 23:22 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > >> Because the return messsges should be routed to the original client that > sent the first message to begin with... >> >> >> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >> Van: Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> >> Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2011 21:28 >> Aan: Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> >> CC: 'Aarno Syvänen' <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Onderwerp: Re: Using smppbox id >> >> why box-id per client? I meant box-id per smppbox. Why do you want box-id > per client? >> >> Alex >> >> Am 19.10.2011 um 21:17 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >> >>> So you want a config option for boxc-id per client? >>> This is the same as configuring a system-type, isn't it? >>> >>> I agree, it's a hack. But better than cluttering the config files. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf >>> Of Alexander Malysh >>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 19:41 >>> To: Aarno Syvänen >>> Cc: [email protected] Devel >>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> just looked through the source code and I can only agree with Andreas: >>> system-type has nothing todo with box-id. >>> I don't know who uses it and why but it's totally wrong. I would just > remake >>> this part and make it straight forward >>> from design and understanding perspective: kill existing box-id hack and >>> implement clean config options for box-id >>> and use _only_ these. >>> >>> @Aarno: you changed the code for data_sm only, how about submit_sm? >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> Am 19.10.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Aarno Syvänen: >>> >>>> This relies on assumption that no two smppbox share a client. I cannot >>> accept this. >>>> Besides, I can have two smppboxes connected to my application >>>> >>>> Aarno >>>> >>>> On 19.10.2011, at 15:19, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Like I said before: In clients.txt, you can put system-type to the >>>>> opensmppbox-id and you are all set. >>>>> >>>>> == Rene >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf >>>>> Of Aarno Syvänen >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 09:35 >>>>> To: [email protected] Devel >>>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my case, there is an application between bearerbox and smppbox. >>>>> Thus application must route to smppbox and not to its clients. >>>>> >>>>> Aarno >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 18.10.201 >> >> >> [Het originele bericht is niet volledig opgenomen] > > >
