is 0 really current time and not 1.1.1970 maybe?
In that case the SMSC is absolutely right in rejecting a delivery in the past.
On 23.05.2012, at 16:07, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi Tanja,
>
> please keep devel@ in CC...
>
> It's not really a BUG of Kannel because in SMPP it's not defined that
> schedule_delivery_time should be in the future.
> Therefore Kannel does what you are asking for, send schedule_delivery_time
> with current time.
>
> We can workaround it in kannel BUT it's mostly your bug to sent deferred=0
> since you know SMSC doesn't accept it.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> P.S. I will fix it in SVN...
>
> Am 23.05.2012 um 15:47 schrieb Tanja Kipreska:
>
>> Hello Alexander,
>>
>> Please find attached requested log(s). I was sending SMS to 38976514008.
>>
>> Meanwhile I was analyzing the code and I believe that changing line no. 963
>> in smsc_smpp.c from
>>
>> if (msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED) {
>>
>> to
>>
>> if ((msg->sms.deferred)&&(msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED)) {
>>
>> may solve the problem.
>>
>> Looking forward to your answer.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tanja
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> could you please provide debug log for this submit_sm?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>> Am 22.05.2012 um 16:45 schrieb Tanja Kipreska:
>>
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I've noticed problem with kannel 1.5.0 when I'm submitting AO-MT sms using
>> > cgi-bin/sendsms deferred parameter. Namely, when i put deferred=0 in the
>> > URL the message is rejected by the SMS center with error "Invalid
>> > scheduled delivery time". I'm currently using kannel 1.3.1 in production
>> > and have performed the same test and message was accepted and successfully
>> > delivered.
>> >
>> > Can this be categorized as bug in kannel 1.5.0 and be fixed soon?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Tanja
>> >
>>
>>
>> <logs.zip>
>
