Hello, Thank you for your prompt response.
As I already sad we were using deferred=0 with kannel 1.3.1 and didn't have problem. We will now accommodate our applications towards kannel 1.5.0 logic. Best regards, Tanja On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Tanja, > > please keep devel@ in CC... > > It's not really a BUG of Kannel because in SMPP it's not defined that > schedule_delivery_time should be in the future. > Therefore Kannel does what you are asking for, send schedule_delivery_time > with current time. > > We can workaround it in kannel BUT it's mostly your bug to sent deferred=0 > since you know SMSC doesn't accept it. > > Thanks, > Alex > > P.S. I will fix it in SVN... > > Am 23.05.2012 um 15:47 schrieb Tanja Kipreska: > > Hello Alexander, > > Please find attached requested log(s). I was sending SMS to 38976514008. > > Meanwhile I was analyzing the code and I believe that changing line no. > 963 in smsc_smpp.c from > > if (msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED) { > > to > > if ((msg->sms.deferred)&&(msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED)) { > > may solve the problem. > > Looking forward to your answer. > > Regards, > Tanja > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> could you please provide debug log for this submit_sm? >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> Am 22.05.2012 um 16:45 schrieb Tanja Kipreska: >> >> > Dear All, >> > >> > I've noticed problem with kannel 1.5.0 when I'm submitting AO-MT sms >> using cgi-bin/sendsms deferred parameter. Namely, when i put deferred=0 in >> the URL the message is rejected by the SMS center with error "Invalid >> scheduled delivery time". I'm currently using kannel 1.3.1 in production >> and have performed the same test and message was accepted and successfully >> delivered. >> > >> > Can this be categorized as bug in kannel 1.5.0 and be fixed soon? >> > >> > Thanks in advance, >> > Tanja >> > >> >> > <logs.zip> > > >
