Hi. I've copied both devel and users list to get quicker response, sorry if it's not right.
We are suffering from quite slow store load (about 100sms/sec) with large queue (about 100k MTs). What could be a possible reason? Could it be slow disk or is there a bug itself inside the kannel? Also we encountered another error while restarting bearerbox: 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: gwlib/gw-rwlock.c:137: gw_rwlock_rdlock: Assertion `lock != NULL' failed. 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_backtrace+0xae) [0x48ba6e] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_panic+0x145) [0x48bbc5] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_rwlock_rdlock+0x54) [0x4818e4] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(route_incoming_to_boxc+0x4b) [0x4126db] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_receive+0x628) [0x419728] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_sent+0x110) [0x41a3d0] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x4596af] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x45af97] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x48292e] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libpthread.so.0(+0x68ca) [0x7fcd35d1a8ca] 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x7fcd3538fb6d] NOTE: we are using simple scheme bearerbox <-> sqlbox and when we are restarting we are closing sqlbox prior to bearerbox
