Is it possible to have store_load in a separate thread? So SQLBox / SMSBox would connect before store fully loaded?
2012/10/16 spameden <[email protected]> > Hi. > > I've copied both devel and users list to get quicker response, sorry if > it's not right. > > We are suffering from quite slow store load (about 100sms/sec) with large > queue (about 100k MTs). > > What could be a possible reason? Could it be slow disk or is there a bug > itself inside the kannel? > > > Also we encountered another error while restarting bearerbox: > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: gwlib/gw-rwlock.c:137: > gw_rwlock_rdlock: Assertion `lock != NULL' failed. > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: > /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_backtrace+0xae) [0x48ba6e] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_panic+0x145) > [0x48bbc5] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: > /usr/sbin/bearerbox(gw_rwlock_rdlock+0x54) [0x4818e4] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: > /usr/sbin/bearerbox(route_incoming_to_boxc+0x4b) [0x4126db] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: > /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_receive+0x628) [0x419728] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: > /usr/sbin/bearerbox(bb_smscconn_sent+0x110) [0x41a3d0] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x4596af] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x45af97] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /usr/sbin/bearerbox() [0x48292e] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libpthread.so.0(+0x68ca) > [0x7fcd35d1a8ca] > 2012-10-16 12:26:02 [9976] [9] PANIC: /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) > [0x7fcd3538fb6d] > > NOTE: we are using simple scheme bearerbox <-> sqlbox and when we are > restarting we are closing sqlbox prior to bearerbox >
