imho a new clean copy development will be better. easier to read, easier to debug, and somehow will be faster development time.
On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote: > The latest opensmppbox head revision keeps giving me headaches. > > For example, if use-smppbox-id = true, then it doesn’t store dlr information. > > Also, the redundant code of box-dlr.c is a little bit too much for me. > > Besides that I received a useful routing patch. But that one depends on > opensmppbox before the use-smppbox-id patch. > > What I would like is to make a separate branch of the current opensmppbox. > And then start with a clean copy where we can start developing on again. > > Does this make sense? > > == Rene > Willy Mularto F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)
