I vote +1 for new stable extended OpenSMPPBox with clean documentation and configuration examples!
2012/12/9 Willy Mularto <[email protected]> > imho a new clean copy development will be better. easier to read, easier > to debug, and somehow will be faster development time. > > > > On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote: > > The latest opensmppbox head revision keeps giving me headaches.**** > ** ** > For example, if use-smppbox-id = true, then it doesn’t store dlr > information.**** > ** ** > Also, the redundant code of box-dlr.c is a little bit too much for me.**** > ** ** > Besides that I received a useful routing patch. But that one depends on > opensmppbox before the use-smppbox-id patch.**** > ** ** > What I would like is to make a separate branch of the current opensmppbox. > And then start with a clean copy where we can start developing on again.** > ** > ** ** > Does this make sense?**** > ** ** > == Rene**** > ** ** > > > Willy Mularto > F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725) > > > > > > > > > >
