Am 17.09.2013 03:06, schrieb Willy Mularto:
+1
It will be good to dump it to bearerbox-access log and flag it as FAILED MT and 
maybe add more info into it so we can analyse it. Thanks Stipe.

BTW, committed to svn trunk.

Disagree here for the "FAILED SMS" access-log entry, since it is logically not failing. The SMSC *HAS* accepted the submit_sm PDU, since we get a submit_sm_resp.command_status = 0x00.

Not sure, but is seems to me that this specific SMCS does not return a message_id *IF* the ESME hasn't requested a delivery report, and if he has requested then they provide the message_id. It still mis-interprets the spec, but at least we can handle it in the sense that the daemon doesn't PANIC out and keeps on running.

Stipe

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to