Patch withdrawn :)

On 18 October 2016 at 13:24, Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> definitely -1 for #ifdef.
> And I agree with Rene here, debug is debug and if you don't like it =>
> don't enable it.
> Kannel has enough infos what's going on even without debug enabled and if
> users
> enable debug they don't have to complain about too much information.
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Malysh
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Stipe Tolj <st...@kannel.org> <st...@kannel.org>
> *Sent*: Monday, September 26, 2016 07:35 PM
> *To*:
> *Cc*: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org> <devel@kannel.org>
> *Subject*: Re: [PATCH] Reduce logging in dbpool_mysql.c
> Am 24.09.2016 13:57, schrieb Rene Kluwen:
> > I don’t agree completely with your reasoning.
> >
> > Either you want debug information or you don’t.
> >
> > Enabling debug information yields a lot of information.
> >
> > What about if you want to debug the mysql pool usage?
> >
> > Still +0 from me in case it’s redundant info.
>
> both points are viable. I know what Donald means here. He wants DEBUG
> level, but not cluttered with "too much deep" info.
>
> I would suggest wrapping the debug() line into a #ifdef DO_DEBUG which
> CAN be defined in the header section of the source file itself. So
> people CAN easily add it as extra DEBUG level information, but we
> wouldn't see it in the "normal" DEBUG way.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Stipe Tolj
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
> http://www.kannel.org/ http://www.tolj.org/
>
> stolj at kannel.org st at tolj.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Donald Jackson

Reply via email to