On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 21:07 -0700, Luis Carlos Cobo Rus wrote: > Hi John, > > there's nothing special about the port or anycast IP, we only need > them to be consistent between MPPs and clients.
Somebody figure it out and let me know :) Dan > On 3/31/07, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The choice of port for the MPP server (953) was unfortunate. > > It is also used by BIND9's remote control interface (rndc). > > > > Can we get this changed ASAP ? > > How about a less useful service, like gopher or timed ? > > Or a non-priviledged port ? > > > > And while we are at it, can we use a less common address for the > > ANYCAST ? Something like 172.31.252.252. I don't want to have > > routing conflicts with some ISP assigning 192.168.x.x to the WAN. > > > > wad > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > Devel@laptop.org > > http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@laptop.org http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
