On 06/24/2010 08:02 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/23/10 21:36, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> On 06/24/2010 08:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> >>> >>> Fix 49 zram build errors in one swoop. Examples: >>> >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:225: error: dereferencing pointer to >>> incomplete type >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:226: error: implicit declaration of >>> function 'bio_for_each_segment' >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:226: error: expected ';' before '{' token >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:281: error: implicit declaration of >>> function 'bio_endio' >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:285: error: implicit declaration of >>> function 'bio_io_error' >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:545: error: implicit declaration of >>> function 'set_capacity' >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: implicit declaration of >>> function 'queue_flag_set_unlocked' >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: 'QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT' undeclared >>> (first use in this function) >>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: dereferencing pointer to >>> incomplete type >>> >> >> >> Thanks for the fix. Strangely, I didn't get any of these >> errors when I compiled against mainline. > > This patch isn't against mainline, it's against linux-next. > See subject's "[PATCH -next]" hint. >
Randy, I understood that your patch is against linux-next. I was just wondering why the error did not come up when I applied and tested this whole zram thing against linux mainline. Anyways, thanks for the fix. Nitin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
