On 06/24/10 08:47, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 06/24/2010 08:02 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 06/23/10 21:36, Nitin Gupta wrote: >>> On 06/24/2010 08:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Fix 49 zram build errors in one swoop. Examples: >>>> >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:225: error: dereferencing pointer to >>>> incomplete type >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:226: error: implicit declaration of >>>> function 'bio_for_each_segment' >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:226: error: expected ';' before '{' token >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:281: error: implicit declaration of >>>> function 'bio_endio' >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:285: error: implicit declaration of >>>> function 'bio_io_error' >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:545: error: implicit declaration of >>>> function 'set_capacity' >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: implicit declaration of >>>> function 'queue_flag_set_unlocked' >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: 'QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT' undeclared >>>> (first use in this function) >>>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c:548: error: dereferencing pointer to >>>> incomplete type >>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the fix. Strangely, I didn't get any of these >>> errors when I compiled against mainline. >> >> This patch isn't against mainline, it's against linux-next. >> See subject's "[PATCH -next]" hint. >> > > Randy, I understood that your patch is against linux-next. I was just > wondering > why the error did not come up when I applied and tested this whole zram thing > against linux mainline.
Did you test a build with CONFIG_BLOCK disabled? > Anyways, thanks for the fix. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
