Code cleanup. The comment is hinting that we should sanity check the header to verify that if it claims its from a 5Ghz channel, that the chip actually supports 5 Ghz. This is redundant (2.4G only chips do not report 5G channels) and thus the comment was removed.
Signed-off-by: Roland Vossen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]> --- drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c index 4f7fc0b..e26ad48 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c +++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c @@ -6846,7 +6846,6 @@ prep_mac80211_status(struct wlc_info *wlc, d11rxhdr_t *rxh, struct sk_buff *p, channel = WLC_CHAN_CHANNEL(rxh->RxChan); - /* XXX Channel/badn needs to be filtered against whether we are single/dual band card */ if (channel > 14) { rx_status->band = IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ; rx_status->freq = ieee80211_ofdm_chan_to_freq( -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
