On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:38 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: KY Srinivasan > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:14 AM > > To: KY Srinivasan; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Properly handle > > errors > > from the host > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: K. Y. Srinivasan [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:27 PM > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected] > > > Cc: KY Srinivasan > > > Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Properly handle > > > errors from > > > the host > > > > > > If the host returns error for pass through commands, deal with them > > > appropriately. I would like to thank James for patiently helping > > > me with this patch. > > > > James, > > > > Thank you for suggesting the fix here. I hope this is what you were looking > > for. > > > > Regards, > > > > K. Y
OK, I have the patch, but the change log is a bit rubbish. I changed it to Hyper-V cannot process some commands like ATA_12 and ATA_16. It also returns a very generic error when this happens (SRB_STATUS_ERROR). Most of the time we treat SRB_STATUS_ERROR as DID_TARGET_FAILURE which causes error handler retry, but in the case of pass through commands, they'll never succeed (and the error handler will offline the device), so put a discriminating block in the command completion routing and send the SRB_STATUS_ERROR upwards with DID_PASSTHROUGH for commands we know should not be retried. James _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
