> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:53 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Properly handle errors
> from the host
> 
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:38 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: KY Srinivasan
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:14 AM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Properly handle 
> > > errors
> > > from the host
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: K. Y. Srinivasan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:27 PM
> > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > > [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > > > [email protected];
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > Cc: KY Srinivasan
> > > > Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Properly handle 
> > > > errors
> from
> > > > the host
> > > >
> > > > If the host returns error for pass through commands, deal with them
> > > > appropriately. I would like to thank James for patiently helping
> > > > me with this patch.
> > >
> > > James,
> > >
> > > Thank you for suggesting the fix here. I hope this is what you were 
> > > looking
> for.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > K. Y
> 
> OK, I have the patch, but the change log is a bit rubbish.  I changed it
> to
> 
> Hyper-V cannot process some commands like ATA_12 and ATA_16. It also returns
> a
> very generic error when this happens (SRB_STATUS_ERROR).  Most of the time
> we
> treat SRB_STATUS_ERROR as DID_TARGET_FAILURE which causes error handler
> retry,
> but in the case of pass through commands, they'll never succeed (and the error
> handler will offline the device), so put a discriminating block in the command
> completion routing and send the SRB_STATUS_ERROR upwards with
> DID_PASSTHROUGH
> for commands we know should not be retried.

Looks good; thanks James.

K. Y
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to