Hi Dan, On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:38:35PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We changed the sizeof() statements in 429ccf058b "staging:panel: Fixed > coding conventions." so that they could fit inside the 80 character > line limit. Unfortunately, the new sizeof() statements are a smaller > size. This reverts it. > > There isn't a nice way to stay within the 80 character limit without > a re-work so I've gone over.
Don't bother too much about the limit anyway, it's more of a guideline, and the first time the code was adapted to fit, it became totally unreadable. And BTW, I think that the only reason for the bug you found precisely is the introduction of these repeat_str/release_str local variables that seem to be there just to reduce line length... > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > --- > Untested. The ->u.kbd.press_str and friends are funny data types. I agree, it looks like the initial intent was to have the strings fit well within the union, but this is all but obvious. > I'm > not sure how this code, works but the stuff we have is wrong and I've > reverted it back to the original. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> Willy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
