On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Guanyou & lianbo,
>
> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be
> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous:
>
> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) {
> ...
> else
> ...
>
> hunk, so there is no need for the
> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously
> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to
> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this.
>
> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang
>
Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou.
I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not
needed.)
Thanks
Lianbo
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
