On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 2:05 PM Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Guanyou, > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi tao, lianbo > > > > Will it be merged before version 8.0.6 ? > > Yes, I'm handling it, will be merged shortly.
Merged with some modifications on the commit log: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/32b03ca26229bf587652952e0ca348354c5dffc5 Thanks, Tao Liu > > Thanks, > Tao Liu > > > > > Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9...@gmail.com> 于2024年9月20日周五 14:54写道： > >> > >> Thanks for the feedback! > >> > >> Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com> 于2024年9月11日周三 11:02写道： > >>> > >>> Hi lianbo, > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <liji...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi Guanyou & lianbo, > >>> >> > >>> >> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be > >>> >> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous: > >>> >> > >>> >> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) { > >>> >> ... > >>> >> else > >>> >> ... > >>> >> > >>> >> hunk, so there is no need for the > >>> >> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously > >>> >> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to > >>> >> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this. > >>> >> > >>> >> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou. > >>> > > >>> > I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not > >>> > needed.) > >>> > > >>> Agreed, let's go with the revert. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Tao Liu > >>> > >>> > Thanks > >>> > Lianbo > >>> -- Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/ Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
