On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path > policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still > allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable.
That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc. but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
