On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:19:07PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > A) Fedora requires backports for problems that break ABI. Note that this > also means that Fedora may need to have people who create non-upstreamable > patches to software since some upstream fixes may require ABI changes and > we'd need to fix those a different way.
Other distributions manage this without too much trouble, so I don't see it being a problem to adopt this policy. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
