On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> > seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive. >> And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to >> packages being considered "potentially unmaintained". > > Is there a secret definition of "potentially" which I am unaware of and > which is causing grief here?
This is the fedora-devel-list .... do I really need to add anything else? ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
