On Apr 23, 2016 09:18, "Florian Weimer" <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 08/13/2015 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:47 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>>> >>>> "Ambivalent" is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine >>>> people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation >>>> experience, after all. >>> >>> >>> The question, I think, is how much we want to prioritize the >>> "Workstation experience" on older hardware (or on devices like the >>> Baytrail tablets). >> >> >> Just to this point - if we wanted to support the Baytrail tablets >> properly we should probably get 64-on-32 working. Allowing 32-bit UEFI >> installs probably isn't something we want to do officially. > > > Has this changed due to IoT? >
I am not sure there has been a very large amount of people interested in doing the work or looking at IoT on i386 since the majority of the hardware is arm and has no eufi > Thanks, > Florian > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org