On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 02:16 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is >> very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as >> much as possible. That is the main motivation here. >> > In other words sacrificing quality for marketing reasons - Utterly poor :( > Well, it's not that easy to schedule Fedora release as you have to avoid real life conflicts - especially autumn release is pretty packed. Thanksgivings in the US, Christmas holidays etc. and hitting these dates actually may affect quality more than anything else. You're under pressure to release but right folks might not available... Releasing right after Christmas is also pretty hard to achieve and then you put the same pressure on spring release and you have to cut again... I did it and even I always tried to be more flexible over strict time based schedules, these were real red flags what to avoid. Jaroslav > > Ralf > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Jaroslav Řezník <jrez...@redhat.com> Engineering Program Manager Office: +420 532 294 645 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 PIN: REZZABBM Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com/
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
