On 6 May 2016 17:24, "Jerry James" <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These > are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing > GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607: gap-pkg-scscp > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332764: gap-pkg-factint > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333204: gap-pkg-utils > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333235: gap-pkg-crisp > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333916: gap-pkg-polenta >
I'd be happy to go through these for you Jerry. In return could you please take a gander at the letsencrypt->certbot re-review I submitted today. Upstream plans their public rename towards the end of the week so it'd be good to have our rename in the testing repos by then. Cheers James
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
