On 07/07/2016 08:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KillUserProcesses_by_default > > Change owner(s): > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> <snip>
Copying my response from https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1600#comment:4 As the Change Proposal stands today, I'm wouldn't be willing to approve it. So let's figure out what it would take to get there: * I want to see a crowdsourced list of all the packages known to be negatively affected by this change. (This should be possible by investigating the various email threads on the issue). * The list of affected packages should be divided into two categories by FESCo: * Tier 1 packages must be ported to support operation under KillUserProcesses=yes by the Contingency Deadline. If any of the Tier 1 packages are still not migrated by that point, we return to the KillUserProcesses=no default until Fedora 26. * Tier 2 packages are non-blocking for this effort. They will be tracked as bugs (probably also listed on the F25 Common Bugs page), but a failure to meet this deadline is not sufficient to prevent us from switching. * I'd like to see the Contingency Deadline set at Beta Freeze. * I would like to see a guideline written up on the wiki and added to the Change Proposal on some of the ways that the porting could be done (such as converting tools to services, using the allow-linger functionality, etc.) * I'd like the package maintainers of any package FESCo declares Tier 1 to be added to the Change Proposal as an owner.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
