On Monday, November 7, 2016 3:28:52 PM CST Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 7.11.2016 v 14:49 Dan Horák napsal(a): > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:37:18 +0000 > > > > Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> > >> > >> wrote: > >>> What is wrong with the PPC? Is it missing dependencies on its own > >>> subpackages or how I should understand this? > >> > >> The tagged build on F-26 was FTBFS on ppc64 so the associated build > >> wasn't imported for rubygem-bson. Fix the rubygem-bson failure (or ask > >> for assistance from the PPC team) and bump the build and the problem > >> goes away. > >> http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3848560 > > I am quite surprised to see this PPC issue that late, since the last > update of rubygem-bson happened more then 2 months ago ... > > But anyway, it is confusing there is taken the fresh noarch subpackage > into compose, but the arch dependency is omitted. You should take either > all or nothing. > > > looks like something ppc64 specific, the latest NVR builds OK on ppc64 > > and s390x > > According to koschei [1], this looks to be Big Endian issue. I already > reported it upstream [2]. There is some Big Endian code, which used to > work [3], but they probably don't have any environment to catch such > regressions ...
composes have always taken the latest tagged build in the tag for the compose into the compose. so its doing exactly as expected. Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
