Hi, > On Nov 23, 2016 8:11 AM, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote: > wrote: > > Can we leave tracker enabled but disable literally every miner? AFAIK the
That is literally, overreacting. Of all tracker processes, only tracker-extract may be expected to open() potentially untrusted files, tracker-miner-fs merely opens private tracker files, and all basic filesystem data extraction is performed through the opendir/stat/inotify_add_watch syscalls, what is exactly insecure in there? Sure, tracker-extract depends on "untrusted" 3rd party libraries, but there is nothing insecure in tracker design to consider its miners an inherent security risk. > mandatory uses of tracker only care about filenames and don't need contents > at all. Not true, full-text search works over more than filenames. > > I would go even farther and argue that Fedora should not, by default, ever > enable a miner that isn't running in *strict* seccomp mode. If that means > that cat pictures aren't identified as such, so be it. And if it means > that several Fedora releases go by with a less functional search, that's > fine too. *points to the written above*, you're talking about rendering entire applications useless based on... not exactly sure what. Cheers, Carlos _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
