On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 11:50 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 10:39 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > > > Per old thread, > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorap > > > roje > > > ct.org/thread/D4QXJ5HBCNJJYWHB7SPOQWL57QMMC63O/ > > > > > > kde-sig retired kdebindings (virtual package), and orphaned the > > > following > > > today: > > > > > > kimono > > > ruby-korundum > > > ruby-qt > > > smokeqt > > > smokekde > > > qyoto > > > > "Of these, I can see *maybe* keeping perl-Qt (and dep smokeqt), > > primarily because it is the only one in this list that's not a leaf > > package (debconf- kde depends on it). " > > > > debconf-kde still need perl-Qt and perl-Qt use libQtCore.so.4 and > > also > > depends on smokeqt > > > > why we want orphan qt4 bindings ? > > BTW I just add some of these packages to epel7 [1] What is your > > advise, > > idea or notes ? > > Note we only orphaned these (not eol/retired). If you have any > interest in > keeping these alive, feel free to take them. > > Be warned, most(all?) of them are unmaintained upstream and have > rawhide > FTBFS issues.
Debian guys will have the same problem (soon or later) because debconf needs perl-Qt also need gtk2 [1], I think I will try drop debconf-kde , for now, seems more easy and see what Debian do , I will write to debconf-devel Mailing list . Anyway perl-Qt is not in the list of packages to be retired , can we build perl-Qt without smokeqt ? any other solution ? Thanks , [1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/debconf libgtk2-perl (>= 1:1.130) libqtcore4-perl libqtgui4-perl -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
