On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: >>> I am not interested in co-maintaining gnupg-1. However I do not oppose >>> to revive it in koji. >> >> Forgive my ignorance of the process, but how can I help this happen? Aside >> from my own problems with the change, there are other reports of people >> upgrading to F13 only to find their GnuPG setup nonfunctional when their >> gnupg transformed into gnupg2: >> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-June/038817.html
> > My understanding is that someone needs to update the gnupg package and > run it through the package review process again since it was deprecated, > not just orphaned. How does this happen (i.e. who is the someone)? I'm happy to help in any way I can, but I'm not currently a Fedora contributor. I'm just an upstream GnuPG guy. > gnupg2 needs to not obsolete gnupg in its .spec file > > And I would also prefer it if gnupg2 didn't overload the gnupg binaries, > keeping things in line with upstream which meant for gnupg 1.x and 2.x > to be installed in parallel. > > That brings up an additional problem in that now we have had users of > f13 using gpg as gpg2, so a switch back might cause some friction -- but > I think it is the right way to do things. I agree. It might cause friction, but of course the status quo is causing friction for some pre-f13 people using gpg when they upgrade to f13. David -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
