On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 16:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! This is just a heads-up for anyone who's been watching the > openQA test results for an update, or something, and been confused. > > A few days ago we added a new ppc64 openQA worker host box; ultimately > we're aiming to enable some of the openQA tests to run on ppc64 as well > as x86_64 and i686. Unfortunately, it seems that openQA's protection > against running jobs on workers of the wrong arch isn't working > properly in our configuration, and since then, openQA has tried to run > quite a lot of x86_64 jobs on ppc64 workers, which of course doesn't > work at all (it blows up immediately because qemu-kvm isn't available, > in point of fact, but it could go wrong for *all kinds* of other > reasons too!) > > I'm just now putting a change in place which should prevent this > happening again, and will try to re-run the tests for all updates which > were affected by this. I do apologize for the bogus failures.
Oh, while I'm at it: you'll also currently get a perfect set of openQA failures for *any* Fedora 24 update. This is because the base disk images for Fedora 24 aren't there any more; I wrote the script that looks after the disk images to only keep images for the last two stable releases around, and forgot about the one-month transition period at the start of a cycle when there are still updates for the last *three* stable releases. I'll try and figure out something to do about this too (it should be possible). Again, sorry for the bogus failures. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
