On 08/24/2017 08:43 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 08/24/2017 10:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> As Remi said, the changes in 6.9.9 are far less significant than those >> in 7.0.6. As several people pointed out, sending 7.x to stable releases >> is clearly against the updates policy. I'd agree we definitely must >> revert to 6.x for F25 and F26 updates; for those we should send out a >> 6.9.9-9 update with rebuilds of all deps. I don't care if F27 and >> Rawhide go to 6.9.9-9 or 7.0.6, but whichever, it should get done soon >> at least for F27. >> >> I'm also willing to work on this, but everyone who's interested should >> agree on a plan first, and then we could possibly split the work up >> (e.g. into 6.x and 7.x work). > > I'll compromise with F25/26 with 6.9 and F27+ getting 7.0. > > I'll get an Epoch bump started... when it completes if you want to do > rebuilds for F25/26 I'll work on F27+.
Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing... Just revert the commits, etc. kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
