On 09/21/2017 11:19 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello all, > > Until last week, I hadn't gone through the new process for requesting > repos and branches or unretiring and unorphaning packages and though I > had read the "WhatHappenedToPkgdb" page, none of the intricacies had > stuck. > After a previously orphaned and retired package got approved, I filed > a request for the repo, separate requests for each branch and after > another day of not being able to push into the remote, I realized that > I had to file a POC change request as well (my mistake, obviously). > A few days ago there was a thread here, where the reasoning behind not > automating repo creation was explained and I am fine with keeping a > choke point under human control, but is it really necessary to break > down the whole process into so many steps, that require human > intervention? With PkgDB we had to file a single request in rhbz for a > new repo, all the branches and ownership change. Does releng really > want all that on its plate, or is this situation temporary, until the > kinks in pagure are ironed out?
Its temporary. My understanding is that soon fedpkg will be able to request all this (wrapping the fedrepo-req details). See: https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/137 We should make sure and ask that you can request the new package and all the branches you want at the same time. Also see: https://pagure.io/fedrepo_req/issue/92 and https://pagure.io/fedrepo_req/pull-request/106 (which is already in stable in f26 at least) kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
